Censorship should be tolerated in certain cases, says Ethereum co-founder

Free Bitcoins: FreeBitcoin | BonusBitcoin

Coins Kaufen: Bitcoin.deAnycoinDirektCoinbaseCoinMama (mit Kreditkarte)Paxfull

Handelsplätze / Börsen: Bitcoin.de | KuCoinBinanceBitMexBitpandaeToro

Lending / Zinsen erhalten: Celsius NetworkCoinlend (Bot)

Cloud Mining: HashflareGenesis MiningIQ Mining


Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage

The crypto industry was created in order to reach true democratization when it comes to governance, as well as true transparency when it comes to money. Nothing is ever on one person or entity to decide, and the communities run everything. However, Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin believes that there are still cases when censorship should be tolerated.

He said as much when he spoke about Ethereum’s solo validators, and he referenced their ability to choose not to include certain transactions.

A hypothetical scenario threatens to turn ETH community into “morality police”

The comment came in reply to a Twitter poll regarding a scenario where validators might choose to censor transactions that do not align with their personal beliefs. Essentially, the discussion was about what should happen to such validators. The user who posted the poll, latetot.eth (@latetot), gave an example — if a solo validator from Country A, which is at war with Country B, decides not to process a transaction that sends a donation to Country B’s military, should that be acceptable behavior on behalf of the validator?

As expected, the hypothetical scenario brought in a lot of different opinions, and in order to prevent things from escalating, Buterin said that some forms of censorship should be tolerated.

He clarified that the amount of censorship should be appropriate to the level of transgression.

Ethereum sees a major change after the Merge

Buterin was not the only major name that joined the discussion. Martin Koppelmann, who co-founded Gnosis, and has been one of Ethereum’s developers for a long time now, also shared his views of the situation, essentially saying that he agreed with Buterin. However, he added that that is only in this specific example. However, he warned that the quick roll-out of MEV-boost, in hindsight, was a mistake and that it should have been done more diligently in order to prevent situations where one entity’s content curation affects 52% of all blocks.

Obviously, this is a complex matter that is anything but black and white. And, while the discussion did revolve around a simple hypothetical scenario, it has brought concerns about censorship in Ethereum’s network. Such concerns have already existed for years, and they were additionally boosted last week after 51% of the blocks were compliant with the US OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) standards, starting on October 14th.

Meanwhile, MEV-Boost relays have managed to take over this massive market share in only a month after the Merge. Mev-Boost relays are essentially centralized entities that work as mediators between builders and block producers. All validators are able to outsource block production to other builders, and with the Merge taking place, MEV-Boost is no longer limited to a small group of miners, but instead, it is now enabled to a more representative distribution of block proposers.

Related

  • Early Stage Presale Live Now
  • Doxxed Professional Team
  • Use Cases in Industry – Offset Carbon Footprint
IMPT

Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage



[ad_2]

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close